Most Polymarket traders lose to the price they pay
We looked at 119,708 resolved positions from 551 active traders. Only about one in three made money, and very few showed skill you can tell apart from luck.
1. Long shots are overpriced. Favorites are slightly underpriced.
If the market price were a perfect probability, contracts bought at 30¢ would win 30% of the time. Across our sample, cheap contracts won less often than their price implied, and expensive ones won slightly more often.
Contracts bought under 10¢ were priced to win 4.3% of the time. They won 3.4%. That gap is the classic favorite–longshot bias, also seen in horse racing and sports betting: people overpay for a small chance at a big payout.
Show the numbers
| Bought at | Positions | Price implied | Actually won |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–5¢ | 6,542 | 2.4% | 1.7% |
| 5–10¢ | 4,058 | 7.3% | 6.2% |
| 10–20¢ | 7,333 | 14.8% | 12.2% |
| 20–30¢ | 9,196 | 25.0% | 20.7% |
| 30–40¢ | 11,155 | 34.7% | 31.0% |
| 40–50¢ | 15,201 | 45.0% | 42.4% |
| 50–60¢ | 19,782 | 53.9% | 53.1% |
| 60–70¢ | 11,675 | 64.8% | 66.0% |
| 70–80¢ | 10,067 | 74.7% | 76.4% |
| 80–90¢ | 9,800 | 85.0% | 86.0% |
| 90–95¢ | 5,586 | 92.5% | 93.5% |
| 95–100¢ | 9,313 | 97.7% | 98.0% |
2. Very few traders can show real edge
For each trader with at least 50 resolved positions (384 traders, median 299 positions each), we measured how much more often their picks won than the prices they paid implied.
39% came out ahead of the price. But only 4.7% were far enough ahead that luck is an unlikely explanation. By chance alone you'd expect about 2.5% to clear that bar. Meanwhile 10.7% were reliably behind the price.
3. Win rate lies
A high win rate feels like skill. It isn't. Buying expensive contracts wins most of the time, but one 90¢ loss wipes out the profit from nine 90¢ wins. Of the 103 traders with a win rate of 60% or more, 50% lost money. And 27% of traders who won under 40% of the time were profitable.
The only test that matters is whether your picks win more often than the price you paid says they should.
4. Where traders overpay
Grouped by market type, most categories are too noisy to call. Two stand out with ranges that don't include zero: soccer (−5.1 pts) and crypto (−1.6 pts). Most crypto positions in the sample were in short "Up or Down" markets.
Are you good, or lucky?
Edgebook runs this same analysis on your own wallet: your edge over the price, by category, with a chart like the one above. Free, read-only, no sign-in.
Check your walletMethodology
- Sample. 600 wallets drawn at random from accounts trading on Polymarket on 2026-10-26: half from the live trade feed, half from trades in the 80 highest-volume open events. That's a sample of active traders, not all Polymarket users, and it leans toward frequent traders and bots.
- Positions. We used each wallet's finished positions: sold, redeemed, or resolved but never redeemed. Polymarket's "closed positions" feed mostly leaves out losses nobody bothered to redeem, so we added resolved positions from the open-positions feed. Skipping that step makes traders look far better than they are.
- Limits. For heavy traders we used the most recent 300 finished positions, plus unredeemed ones from the same period. 30 wallets with very large unredeemed lists were left out because we couldn't see them completely. Results restricted to wallets with full histories point the same way.
- Edge. A resolved position counts as a win if its side paid out. Edge compares that against the average entry price. Positions sold before resolution count in profit figures but not in edge. Fees are not included, so real results are slightly worse.
- Statistics. Price-range ranges are Wilson 95% intervals. Category ranges come from resampling traders 400 times. A trader "rules out luck" when their average edge is more than 1.96 standard errors above zero.
- Categories are assigned by keywords in the market title and URL, so a few markets will be misfiled.
- We publish only aggregate results. No individual wallet is named.